tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8655107296817879830.post2719012951824855035..comments2024-03-16T16:43:39.579+05:30Comments on சுபவீ வலைப்பூ: தாமஸ் ஆல்வா எடிசனும் ஒரு மீனும்சுப.வீரபாண்டியன்http://www.blogger.com/profile/12778485531087300746noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8655107296817879830.post-67368207838672073062015-09-28T17:23:36.755+05:302015-09-28T17:23:36.755+05:30Yes, he opposed what we today call "Conventio...Yes, he opposed what we today call "Conventional religion". I say "Conventional" because Deists themselves have their own view of God, which also has not been proved scientifically, and hence Deism is also a religious concept(belief-based and not rational), though not conventional like Christianity, which he primarily opposed. So, he naturally opposed the Bible and its Vinodnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8655107296817879830.post-43114894685792326242015-09-27T17:58:31.442+05:302015-09-27T17:58:31.442+05:301) "I have never seen the slightest scientifi...1) "I have never seen the slightest scientific proof of the religious theories of heaven and hell, of future life for individuals, or of a personal God. [Thomas Alva Edison, Columbian Magazine]"<br /><br />2) "So far as religion of the day is concerned, it is a damned fake... Religion is all bunk. [Thomas Edison]"<br /><br />3) "I cannot believe in the immortality of the GANESHVEL MANIGANDHIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00465731298580777350noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8655107296817879830.post-45948755866768625782015-09-23T22:56:41.176+05:302015-09-23T22:56:41.176+05:30Good to hear from you too, Sir! I have been regula...Good to hear from you too, Sir! I have been regularly following your posts ever since the Gita debate. I am glad you find my extra information useful. <br /><br />And yes, the line about science in the quote I mentioned is indeed telling a very important truth. As I had mentioned previously during the Gita debate, I am a scientist by profession, so I would be the last person to refute that Vinodnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8655107296817879830.post-52510735805396233772015-09-23T18:17:17.522+05:302015-09-23T18:17:17.522+05:30நன்றி திரு வினோத்! கீதை விவாதத்திற்குப் பிறகு மீண்...நன்றி திரு வினோத்! கீதை விவாதத்திற்குப் பிறகு மீண்டும் உங்களை வலைத்தளத்தில் சந்திப்பது மகிழ்ச்சி. வழக்கம்போல், தேவையான கூடுதல் செய்திகளைக் சேர்த்துள்ளீர்கள். எனினும், நீங்கள் மேற்கோள் காட்டியுள்ள The final resolution of this problem will eventually be up to science to settle." என்னும் வரி தெளிவாக ஓர் உண்மையை உணர்த்துவதை மறுக்க மாட்டீர்கள் என்று நினைக்கிறேன்.<br /> <br /> I believe in one சுப.வீரபாண்டியன்https://www.blogger.com/profile/12778485531087300746noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8655107296817879830.post-23517629052141316292015-09-23T12:20:20.701+05:302015-09-23T12:20:20.701+05:30I would like to add some more information that is ...I would like to add some more information that is related to this interview in NewYork Times by Edison. Many people who read this interview thought that Edison was expressing atheist ideas through his remarks, but that was not so. I quote below from the wikipedia page on Edison, which in turn refers to a letter he wrote following the public reaction to the interview:<br /><br />"Edison was Vinodnoreply@blogger.com